Blind 75 vs NeetCode 150 vs Striver SDE Sheet
Three of the most-recommended DSA lists on the internet, side by side. Which to grind depends on your timeline and whether you want a curriculum or a minimal hit-list — here's the honest call.
Pick one sheet, not three. The three popular Indian DSA sheets overlap heavily, and the time people lose is not on choosing the wrong sheet but on switching between them. Below is how they compare, using the overlap we can count in the DSA Tracker dataset, and a plain rule for choosing.
DSA Tracker curates 370 problems across 22 topics, and each problem records which sheets include it. Of those 370, 315 appear in the Striver A2Z sheet, 248 appear in the Love Babbar 450 sheet, and 104 appear in the Apna College sheet. Seventy-five problems appear in all three.
Those 75 are the useful part. If three independent sheet authors all picked the same problem, it is a core pattern, not one author's taste. The site lists them on its Consensus 75 page, and they are a sensible starting block whichever sheet you choose.
| Striver A2Z | Love Babbar 450 | Apna College | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Problems in this tracker | 315 | 248 | 104 |
| Shape | Step-by-step, easy to hard inside each topic | Topic-wise list, less guided | Shortest list of the three |
| Best for | Full preparation with a guided order | Revising a known list quickly | A first pass when time is short |
The counts above come from our own dataset, not from the sheets' official totals, so they describe what this tracker includes, not every problem each sheet has ever listed.
If you have three months or more and start from a weak base, follow Striver A2Z. Its ordering does the planning for you: each topic moves from easy to hard, so you are never guessing what to do next. The cost is size. You need discipline to keep a long sequence moving.
If you already know the basics and want to check coverage, use Love Babbar 450. A topic-wise list is easy to scan for gaps. It gives less handholding, so it suits someone who can judge their own weak areas.
If your first round is a month or two away, start with the Apna College list. It is the smallest of the three here, and finishing a small list is worth more than half-finishing a big one. When it is done, use the Striver problems it did not cover as the next block.
Do not merge the three lists into one giant checklist. A merged list runs to hundreds of problems with no order, and you spend your energy managing the list instead of solving. Overlap also hides in the titles: the same problem often appears under different names, so a merge double-counts.
Sorting by role helps more than sorting by sheet. A frontend candidate and an embedded candidate need different topics first, regardless of which sheet the problems came from. Once you have chosen your sheet, order it by what your target role asks about, and skip the topics that role rarely tests.
Next step: open the Consensus 75 list, solve the ten easiest problems on it this week, and see how they feel. If they feel manageable, take the Striver order from there. If they feel heavy, spend a week on the Apna College list first.
Three of the most-recommended DSA lists on the internet, side by side. Which to grind depends on your timeline and whether you want a curriculum or a minimal hit-list — here's the honest call.
C++ is fast, Java is explicit, Python is short. But interviewers grade your problem-solving, not your syntax. Here is how to pick the one language you'll actually stick with.